Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Stories like this don’t happen everday – but they should, and hopefully will, more often.

Over the weekend Greenpeace Canada posted a video on YouTube critical of food giant Nestle’s use of non-sustainable palm oil in products like its popular KitKat chocolate bar. Greenpeace asserts Palm oil is made on plantations created by razing the Indonesian rain forest – a major source of greenhouse gas reduction and orangutan habitat. The video shows a bored office worker chowing down on a KitKat unaware that what he actually pulls from the wrapper are orangutan fingers – complete with oozing blood.

Nestle quickly had YouTube pull the video for “copyright infringement” but not before it was copied to other sites on the net. You can see the video as part of this Digital Journal ariticle.

In the March 22 episode of the social media podcast, For Immediate Release (FIR #536), hosts Shel Holtz and Neville Hobson reported that the issue spilled over to Nestle’s Facebook page – which had more than 94,00 fans at “press” time. ["Pressing" the Publish button on my blog that is:-)] They said many fans of the page had answered Greenpeace’s call to change their fan pictures to anti-Nestle logos like this:

Bill Hunter

They also said that Nestle had responded by deleting the pictures and having one of their PR people respond, sometimes rudely, to some of the comments on the page. Nestle then, apparently, reversed its decision, stoppped deleting the logos and had the PR person apologise. A look at the page now suggests the FIR report was right on the money. The logos are there as are all the negative comments. The page is now an ad for how bad Nestle is and Nestle, to their great credit, is letting it all happen. In addition, a March 23, Vancouver Sun story reported that “Nestlé responded to the campaign within hours, announcing it would follow in the footsteps of other companies, such as Unilever and Kraft, by cancelling contracts with [Nestle's Indonesian supplier of palm oil] Sinar Mas. The Switzerland-based company has also committed to using only “certified sustainable palm oil” in its products by 2015.”

It took them a while but Nestle finally got it and learned that real power lies in letting people comment, listening to what they say and changing if you’re in the wrong.

None of this is easy to do, especially for large companies. However, these companies, and the people who run them, didn’t get where they are by doing what’s easy.

Well done Nestle. And well done Greenpeace. I think I’ll go have a KitKat…

If you have a story about progressive groups using social media to spur change or any other thoughts on this post please leave a comment!

Just read a Globe and Mail article titled “M&S retreats over bra brouhaha” about how the British company Marks & Spencer reversed its decision to charge more for oversized bras after more than 14,000 women joined a Facebook group to protest the “tit tax”. Busts 4 Justice now has more than 17,000 members and a message saying:

We are really happy to say that, thanks to the members of Busts 4 Justice, M&S have decided to abolish the tit-tax, and from now on will be operating a one-price-fits-all policy across their ranges.
We would like to thank everyone who has supported us on this issue; especially the thousands of brilliant, busty women that have joined forces with us. We couldn’t have done this without you.
Busts 4 Justice remain committed to making things better for busty women on the high street, but for now we’re happy just to be able to encourage all ladies to reward themselves and their boobs with some properly fitted, fairly priced lingerie.
Much love, Becky and Beckie a.k.a. Busts 4 Justice x"

Marks & Spencer ran full page ads in British newspapers, May 9, apologizing for the pricing and saying it was immediately reversing its policy. The ads featured a picture of large breasts with the caption, “We boobed.”

M&S’s response is to be modeled because they listened and publicly admitted they messed up and were changing the policy – using ads that were funny without being mocking. By these actions they may have turned 14,000 angry women back into 14,000 existing – or new M&S customers. 

Now this is what I call appropriate use of technology…

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2008/10/c8472.html